Dear Mitt Romney,
I
don't know who you are anymore.
You
have no doubt heard that last Wednesday, President Obama endorsed the right of
same-sex couples to be wed. In response, you predictably disagreed with the
President's position, but also said this:
"I don't favor civil unions if they're identical to marriage other than by name. My view is that domestic partnership benefits, hospital visitation rights and the like are appropriate."
Wow.
Using the defense of protecting traditional marriage is one thing, but you just
took discrimination to a whole different level. In this statement you made it
clear that your interest is not in preserving the definition of marriage, but
in expressly limiting the rights of same-sex couples. A civil union, identical
to marriage other than by name, is not an ideal solution for proponents of
same-sex marriage. However, it satisfies, to a limited extent, those who
believe in preserving the definition of traditional marriage and those who advocate for expansion of
the rights granted to same-sex couples. At least, until you came along, and in
a blatant pander to the religious right, made this your official platform.
As
a Republican and an LGBT person, I am a member of a very small voting bloc, and
probably not one that you have to worry much about. I will likely still vote
for you - economic issues, your strong suit, are more pressing - but with
reservations. I know that at least one of your major backers, Bill White,
withdrew his support and joined Team Obama after the daylight between you and
the President on this issue became clear. More may follow. Are you prepared to
alienate independents and young people, not to mention ostracize a major
minority, for the sake of becoming a "fake" conservative?
You
see, Mr. Romney, I don't believe you understand what true conservatism is.
Conservatism is the belief that a limited government, which does only what it
must, is the path to a prosperous society. I see no need under conservative
values for the government to tell me who I may and may not marry. Nor do I see
the need for forcing one definition of marriage, one espoused by only a segment
of the population, upon the entire country. That is the exact kind of big
government you should advocate against.
I
certainly hope you and the rest of the GOP come to understand that protecting
the liberties of our entire population, and by default supporting same-sex
marriage, is an intrinsic element of conservative philosophy. If you want to be
a true conservative, Mr. Romney, stop following what people say about our
philosophy, and start following our philosophy.
Best
of luck in November,
Preston
Cooper
No comments:
Post a Comment
Red Slate encourages you to comment on these posts and share your ideas. Please be respectful in your comments; if you come across as angry or rude, other readers won't take what you write seriously!