Showing posts with label Regulation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Regulation. Show all posts

Thursday, June 14, 2012

All or Nothing for the Eurozone


By Preston Cooper

I apologize for not being on Red Slate during the past several days. The reason for my absence was a conference on financial relationships between the US and Italy in Venice, which I was fortunate enough to attend. One of the principal issues discussed over a plate of pasta and soporific Italian wine was the impending Eurozone crisis brought on by irresponsible budgeting and regulation by several of the currency zone's members, such as Italy and Greece.

In the coming months, the countries of the Eurozone will have to decide whether to centralize several aspects of financial regulation such as deposit insurance and currency supervision. If they want the Euro to survive, this is pretty much their only option. When the actions of a government in one country, such as Greece, bear on the state of all other countries which share the currency, there is a big problem, as those other countries have no control over Greece's actions. Greece could, and will, drive the Euro into the ground, with the rest of the continent powerless to stop it.

The other option, of course, is to dismantle the Euro entirely. When Greece returns to the drachma and Italy to the lira, their economies will undergo a fair amount of tumult; however, it is impossible to predict just how much their domestic crises will bleed into the other EU countries. Eventually the former Eurozone will stabilize; but the continent will have lost the advantage of a single, strong currency, which has mobilized Second World countries such as Slovakia and Latvia to whip their economies into shape for the chance of joining it. It would be a shame to lose the Euro, seeing how far it has come.

Centralization, then, is the best way forward. As a conservative, I am skeptical of centralized regulation, but a single currency warrants it. There is a reason why the US has a Federal Reserve (albeit an over-empowered one) rather than fifty State Reserves. Fifty different economies, all regulating the dollar with little coordination between them, wouldn't work in America, and there's no reason to think it will work in the Eurozone.

Europe must establish a single deposit insurer, a single banking supervisor, a single currency regulator, and expand the powers of its existing central bank. The ECB should issue a "Euro-bond" to finance the deficits of the Eurozone's seventeen countries. And most importantly, each nation must submit its annual budget to a centralized council for approval. Irresponsible budgeting will not be tolerated.

For the Eurozone, it's all or nothing.

Thursday, May 24, 2012

JP Morgan Losses: A Crisis Done Right

By Preston Cooper


Photo courtesy of Wikipedia
Last week's $2 billion (now likely much higher) trading loss at megabank JP Morgan Chase sent the financial world into a frenzy. The bank's stock plunged more than twenty percent, and regulators in Washington leaped at the opportunity to call for stronger oversight of Wall Street. Many have called for the resignation of JPM's CEO, Jamie "Panache" Dimon, from the New York Fed's Board of Governors.

I don't see what the hullabaloo is about.

Yes, JPM's trading loss was large, but the bank will likely still turn a profit in the second quarter. This will not cripple the company by any means. What's more, had something like this happened at JPM's two ugly stepsisters - Bank of America and Citi - it would probably not even make headlines.

JPM remains a very well-managed bank. It will not be needing a taxpayer bailout anytime soon. The company will absorb its own losses, the managers responsible for the damage will resign, and business will eventually return to normal. This is how a crisis should be done. The tumult in the media and on Wall Street is unnecessary.

Moreover, the response of Washington regulators reveals that the loss has had a good effect - it is inspiring discussion about how to improve the financial regulatory system. This is good - conservatism does not oppose regulation; it opposes inappropriate or inefficient regulation. Good regulation is healthy for the economy, as it mitigates damage in times of crisis.

As far as I'm concerned, financial regulation has two aims:

1. To protect depositors' money. When you deposit money in a bank, you should - and do - have a guarantee that your money is safe. The government has a duty to make sure banks' practices do not jeopardize the money you're saving for college or retirement.

2. To protect the economy from the failure of systemic institutions. If the failure of an institution will have a major negative effect on the country, it is necessary for the government to ensure that the institution does not incur undue risk of collapse. However, under no circumstances is it appropriate for the government to bail out a failing institution with taxpayer money.

If regulation of the financial sector does not pertain to one of these two goals, it is bad regulation and is most likely antithetical to the free market. JP Morgan is a systemic institution as well as a savings bank, so increased oversight of its trading practices may be necessary to ensure that it does not put depositors' money or the larger economy at risk. However, I am confident that JPM will emerge from this setback stronger, an exemplar of how to properly navigate a crisis.